Book Review - A Case for Amillennialism

Posted by Phil Miller on Jan 2nd, 2008
2008
Jan 2

Over the Christmas break, I took some time to finish A Case for Amillennialism by Kim Riddlebarger.  The subject of eschatology is brought up here quite frequently, so I felt like it would be suitable to post a review of this book here.

As the title suggests, the book is a straightforward explanation of the Amillenniallist view of eschatology.  The book comes in at just under 250 pages, and Riddlebarger’s fluid no-nonsense writing style makes for a relatively quick read.  If you aren’t familiar with the Biblical passages that are referenced, it would be a good idea to have your Bible nearby for quick reference.

First, a little detail about the author.  Dr. Riddlebarger is senior pastor of Christ Reformed Church in Anaheim, California, and visiting professor of systematic theology at Westminster  Seminary California. He is also a co-host of the White Horse Inn radio program, which is broadcast weekly on more than fifty radio stations.  The rest of his bio can be found here on his blog.  One thing I find most interesting is that he is firmly in the Reformed camp, and he is one of the few voices I have heard speak out against the Dispensationalist theology that seems to have gotten the most press recently.

I will not spend the time here to describe all the different views on eschatology, as I think this Wiki page does a fair job of describing the basics.

According to Riddlebarger:

Amillenniallists hold that the promises made to Israel, David, and Abraham in the Old Testament are fulfilled by Jesus Christ and his church during this present age.  The millennium is the period of time between the two advents of our Lord with the thousand years of Revelation 20 being symbolic of the entire interadvental age.  At the first advent of Jesus Christ, Satan was bound by Christ’s victory over him at Calvary and the empty tomb.  The effects of his victory continued because of the presence of the kingdom of God via the preaching of the gospel and as evidenced by Jesus’ miracles.  Through the spread of the gospel, Satan is no longer free to deceive the nations.  Christ is presently reigning in heaven during the entire period between Christ’s first and second coming.  At the end of the millenial age, Satan is released, a great apostasy breaks out, the general resurrection occurs, Jesus Christ returns in final judgment for all people, and he establishes a new heaven and earth.

pp. 31-32

Even if you don’t have a background in Biblical eschatology, Dr. Riddlebarger makes it easy for all readers to come to a point of understanding.  He systematically goes through the Prophets, the Olivet Discourse, and of course, the Revelation.  The book is well footnoted throughout (the chapter on Revelation 20 has 100 notes alone), and he is a careful researcher.  At every point, Dr. Riddlebarger dismantles potential arguments against his point, and he does so convincingly.

Throughout the book, Dr. Riddlebarger makes the point that the Biblical authors consistenly wrote with a “two-age” model in mind - “This Age”, and the “Age to Come”.  Basically, when Christ came the first time, it was the beginning of “The Age to Come”.  We are stil living in the period when “The Age to Come” is here in some sense, but yet we still await final consummation when Christ returns and Heaven, Earth, and all Creation are restored.  This tension is paralled by Jesus’ now but not-yet descriptions of the Kingdom of God.  When viewed through this lens, in my opinion, Biblical prophecy becomes much clearer.  The Scriptures become unified in a way that I didn’t see earlier.

My background in the End Times puzzle is rooted in the Pre-Mill/Dispensational camp.  I grew up with the charts and graphs on flannelgraphs, and we expected to be raptured hopefully before the Tribulation.  Through the years, I’ve come to question that view, but I’ve been unsure as to where to start.  I feel that this book not only helped me on this journey, but it has given me tools to help me further down the road.

I could go into a lot more detail about the book, but for the sake of space I will not here.  I will answer any questions to the best of my ability, but I would really recommend this book to anyone who is confused or wants to learn more about Biblical eschatology.

10 Responses

  1. Keith Says:

    I read A Case for Amillennialism a while back; picked it up at the National Founders Conference. You said the book “helped me on this journey”…do you now lean toward an Amill view? Have you come to a different conclusion re: the Premill view?

    Another good book on the subject: The Last Days According to Jesus by R. C. Sproul

  2. Dave Muller Says:

    How interesting that there is an Amill-Reformed person! I thought only semi-p-oneness-penticostals like me believed it :P

  3. Tim Reed Says:

    How interesting that there is an Amill-Reformed person! I thought only semi-p-oneness-penticostals like me believed it

    Amills are also found in Lutheran and Restoration Movement circles. Although I think in order to live in Michigan you have to be a Dispy. I snuck in through an underground network of Amil spies.

  4. Phil Miller Says:

    Keith,
    I am pretty comfortable saying I am in the Amil camp, and I would have probably said it before reading the book. I thought the book gave a good defense, and it brought up a lot of good points. I found some of the references in the back of the book to be particularly useful, and I plan on adding them to my reading list.

    This is one subject I’m a little bit hesitant to take a big stand on, particularly because the denomination I am involved with (A/G) takes a pretty tough Premil/Dispensationalist position. I know there are some who would probably consider not agreeing with that position close to heresy, and frankly, it’s not something I feel like getting in huge fights over. On the other hand, I feel that the position put forth by the Hal Lindseys and Tim LaHayes of the world has been really harmful to some peope, so I want to be informed enough to offer an educated opinion when asked by people.

  5. Keith Says:

    Phil:
    It takes all kinds. As Tim Reed knows, I am not a fan of the the Restoration Movement, however, having spent 16 years there, I did come out of there with an appreciation for the Amill view. I’ve met a lot of people from that denomination that hold an Amill view. The one RM college I’ve had the most contact with–Ozark CC in Joplin, MO–seemed to produce quite a few Amill’s.

    I was raised in a very strong, Premill-”Dispy” home/church. It is no secret around here (CRN.Info) that I enjoy the teaching of John MacArthur, but this is one area where I think he gets it wrong. There are more Amill-Reformed people out there than you may think.

    You might also check out Gary DeMar’s Last Days Madness.

  6. Tim Reed Says:

    I don’t make eschatology a huge test of faith. The only reason I take any interest in it is because of the huge emphasis and near fanaticism shown by dispies.

  7. Keith Says:

    It’s not a “test of fellowship” for me…although I was tempted ONCE to purchase a Left Behind mousepad!

  8. Joe Martino Says:

    I was raised in a very strong, Premill-”Dispy” home/church.

    I can say that about my church and the Bible College I went to.
    I can’t really say that about my home. My parents both had a pretty simple love of God. He loves us and He’s in charge. That was enough for them. When I went to Bible college and started to talking to them about some of the stuff I was taught/discussing my mom’s face was often priceless. I can

  9. Phil Miller Says:

    I can

    Joe, were you raptured away mid-comment?

    Jack Van Impe was right!

  10. Neil Says:

    When I studied at Dallas Seminary the Amill guys were portrayed (when they came up) as being less serious in their scholarship and sometimes it was implied (sometimes stated) that they had a low view of the Scriptures based on their lack of literal hermeneutics.

    I found A Case for Amillennialism to be very good and although I have yet to embrace amillennialism (I have abandoned the dispensational pov) I thought it well reasoned. It certainly helped me gain an appreciation for the position - and those who hold it.