Ludicrous Speed has been reached on the ironicometer (UPDATED)

Posted by Tim Reed, Owosso MI on Nov 29th, 2007
2007
Nov 29

Ken Silva writes:

Kind of duck and cover time for Christians being accosted by…well, other Christians.

Yeah, its a real shame when Christians attack other Christians. Next thing you’ll be telling is that there’s an entire online cottage industry devoted to nothing but Christians attacking other Christians. Why they might even call themselves “pastor-teachers”, or “Reverend” and they could even go so far as to regularly lie about other Christians.

Whoo, now that’s a grim alternate reality that we can all be thankful hasn’t come to pass.

UPDATE: Here’s the link to the moved article.

The Great Link Whore Scavenger Hunt **Updated***

Posted by Tim Reed, Owosso MI on Nov 29th, 2007
2007
Nov 29

This latest post by Silva is pretty amazing, and not in a good way. We’re all aware of how Silva link whores his own personal website every chance he gets, and he attempts to drive google traffic by using the names of well known theologians, authors, and ministers (which is why he can’t mention Nathan Neighbours without also mentioning McManus). But this latest post may be the greatest example of that. So I’ve come up with a formula to determine what is the greatest example of link whoring.

Simply take the number of names not focused on the point being made, add to it the number of times a personal website is mentioned and/or linked to from a different blog, and divide by the number of words in a post (you can copy/paste to word to do the word count automagically). So this particular post gives us a link whore rating of .066 (he mentioned Kimball, McLaren, Apprising “Ministries” mentioned once, Apprising “Ministries” linked 4 times, Haggee and Warren X2 divided by a word count of 151).

So there it is people, if you can beat a link whore index rating of .066 I’ll give you some sort of totally sweet shout out.

****Updated****
I messed up the math. There were 4 additional links to Apprising “Ministries” I missed the first time through thinking they were links to the websites of the people being mentioned to add to google traffic, so the total has been adjusted up to .066, raising the bar for everyone out there.

***Updated 2***
And just like that Silva out link whores himself in his very next post. This post garners a link whore index rating of .074 (no less than four links to Apprising “Ministries” in only 54 words). Congratulations to Silva on his outstanding work in the field of link whoring.

PREACH IT BROTHER! (and only preach it)

Posted by Nathan on Nov 29th, 2007
2007
Nov 29

In this article posted at The Expositor, Nathan White of Strange Baptist Fire writes about the evils of Christmas plays in the church. Here are his three basic premises from the piece

  • What can be better for our souls than the preached Word?
  • What can be better for those outside of Christ than the clear proclamation of the gospel through the preached Word?
  • If preaching was completely sufficient to minister and save in scripture, who are we to say that it is now supplemented, at times, by better things? Has market research replaced biblical revelation?

In classic ODM style, he accuses –well, just read this

It certainly must be noted that drama in worship is most often employed by seeker-sensitive, Arminian ministries, in an apparent attempt to evangelize…But it must be emphasized that the preaching of the word, the very proclamation of Jesus Christ, is simply not good enough, according to this logic, to attract a wide audience, and so the Christmas play is employed to bring in those who wouldn’t otherwise darken the door. Christmas plays do not offend, they do not divide households, they are generally warm and fuzzy at a very family-oriented time of year, and so they provide a great impetus for the numbers-driven mindset. (emphasis mine)

He then makes a pretty weighty statement to backup

drama in worship, without a doubt, *is* a violation of scripture…God, through scripture, has left drama completely out of His Word and instruction to His Church, and that for an important reason.

There are so many flaws in this article; I really don’t know where to begin. I am not quite sure how one can say that the reenactment of the word of God is any less powerful than talking about the word of God from the pulpit. We are not talking about a production of The Sound of Music, we are talking about a Christmas pageant. There are so many Christmas shows that often hit you over the head with the scriptures, and are very blatant in their message. I always find it ironic that these pastors complain about arts in the church, but unless they get up and simply read straight from the scriptures and say nothing but the scriptures, they too are using an artistic way to preach the scriptures. They decide how to word ideas and concepts, they choose illustrations, and they craft how we perceive the scriptures every Sunday. It is arrogant to say that only what they are doing is preaching the Word of God, when 75% of the words they give are their own.

Do we labels something as bad or heretical if it does not offend or divide households? That notion is completely asinine, but is all too common among the ODMs. If it brings people together to enjoy the story of Christmas, then it must be wrong. If no one leaves the place offended, someone messed up. And, to argue that something is inappropriate for worship simply because it is not mentioned in the scriptures is not exactly the best logic. Most hymns would be out of the question if we are going to go down that route. But, did Jesus not tell stories as a means to communicate biblical truth? It seems to me that story-telling is one of the most important elements in theatre arts.

As an actor, it is strange to hear someone say that I cannot worship God with the talents he has given me. I have been using theatre arts as a means to present the truth for years. Many of my friends have come to Christ through shows that we have produced that speak clearly the word of God. I am always puzzled as to why the church today is do hesitant when it comes to the arts. It is ok for a man to give a 45 minute monologue about the scriptures, but to present it in theatrical form or paint it is simply out of the question. We live in a world where a television show is worth a million words, a painting is worth a thousand, and words are only worth pennies. Maybe it is time we rethink how present the Word (please note that nowhere did I say rethink the Word itself).