Hurting People Hurt People
I sometimes feel sorry for the watch doggies. I mean, if I realized that my way of doing church was going to be obsolete in a matter of years with the culture shift taking place around the globe, I would be fearful too. As I have said in earlier posts, fear lies behind a lot of what they do. Many will be out of jobs; still some will find themselves screaming from soapboxes to silent ears. But in a world where truth is not only relative, but non existent, a 1700’s man-made model from for Christianity is just not going to cut it. I think many know it, and are very fearful.
For example, pyromaniacs have recently released two new de-motivating posters to their collection. One reads “Cruelty: when critics satirize emerging/postmodern values†and the other “Comedy: when emergents diss their critics.†My dad always told me that hurting people will always hut people. When a dog is wounded, he will only wound (an appropriate analogy for this situation). It seems to me that these are more about attacking an opponent than discerning and informing. I find it funny that when the watch doggies criticize others it is discernment from God Himself to His people (after all, isn’t discernment a spiritual gift). When someone defends their beliefs or another brother from false discernment, they call it cruelty. Pretty interesting paradigm they live by.


Interesting though… after this they really have no reason to attack emerging movement for using media to communicate a point, right?







[...] *Gen. Ed. Note* Nathan Neighbour, a disciple of Cultural Architect Erwin McManus of the emerging church Mosiac, has also commented on the poster issue. [...]