This is rather unusual for this blog/format, but I would like to take a comment from the thread started yesterday by Nathan (thanks!) and elevate it to a post of its own - because of its tone, content and concise thought. I could not agree more, and I only wish I could write as thoughful and sarcasm-free comments as this gentleman (who is a first-time commenter on this blog):
Ken,
I don’t know you, and I don’t know all your motives, but I will assume that you do what you do out of a sincere conviction and love.
I am a frequent visitor of CRN, and I’ve read much of your problems with ‘emergent’, the ‘emerging church’, Rob Bell, Donald Miller, Brian Mclaren, Erwin McManus, and others.
I do agree with some of what you say on CRN, namely about T.D. Jakes, Sylvia Brown, and maybe a few others (though I disagree with you centering on T.D. Jakes ideas of the trinity and not pointing out the equally important fact of his lavish lifestyle and false teachings about a ‘rich’ Jesus)
One of my main concerns is what you’ve said about Donald Miller. First of all, you label him ‘emergent’, which is pretty untruthful, unloving, and wrong. And your arguments against him…I dunno, but this link here contains a quote from him: http://www.apprising.org/archives/2007/02/is_donald_mille.html
Then after quoting him, you proceed to tear him apart, label him emergent, and denounce his ‘teachings’ as heretical. You take one quote, and then you pretty much tell him what he meant. That’s not how it works. As Paul washer has said, you have to read the whole book to see what he meant. and I recommend reading Searching For God Knows What by Donald Miller if you haven’t yet. It may clear things up. If not, well, I’m sorry that you have that misunderstanding of him. And, by the way, his church, Imago Dei, is ‘reformed,’ as you also seem to be and as Paul Washer is (I’m pretty sure.) I hope your perception and (hopefully) misunderstandings about Miller will clear up.
When I first read all your info on Rob Bell, I thought some things you said were somewhat valid. (By the way, thanks for having a link to his sermon on revelation, I loved it)
However, when I got his book, Velvet Elvis, and got to read it myself, I was shocked at how some of the things he said were distorted . For example he said “you can’t simply do what the Bible says.†But in the book, Bell goes on to explain why- because before we can do it, we have to decide what it means!!! Before we can love our neighbor, we have to understand and decide what love is, what it looks like, who our neighbor is, etc. Before we can believe in Jesus we have to understand who Jesus is, what believing means, whether it is simply agreeing to a list of ideas or not. (Donald Miller talks quite a bit about the whole agreeing to a list of ideas/facts in his book SFGKW)
I recommend being very wise in which battles you choose, as well as reading what John has to say in 1 John about what God wants from us: 1) to believe in Jesus, and 2) to love one another. It seems to me that those two things, along with loving the Lord our God, are really the core and essentials of our faith.
love in Christ,
Tim
Thank you, Tim.